GETSIE v. BOROUGH OF BRADDOCK


126 Pa.Commw. 639 (1989)

560 A.2d 875

Alice GETSIE et al. v. BOROUGH OF BRADDOCK et al. Appeal of HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. Irene DRUSKY v. BOROUGH OF BRADDOCK et al. Appeal of HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. Alice GETSIE et al. v. BOROUGH OF BRADDOCK et al. Appeal of BOROUGH OF BRADDOCK, Appellant. BOROUGH OF BRADDOCK, Appellant, v. Irene DRUSKY, Appellee.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided June 19, 1989.

Reargument Denied August 29, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Webster, Springer, Bush & Perry, Pittsburgh, for Hartford Life Ins.

John A. Bacharach, Girman & Bacharach, Pittsburgh, for Borough of Braddock.

Thomas H.M. Hough, Hough & Gleason, P.C., Pittsburgh, Anthony J. Martin, Martin & Martin, Monroeville, for appellees.

Before BARRY and SMITH, JJ., and NARICK, Senior Judge.


SMITH, Judge.

Appellants, Borough of Braddock (Borough) and Hartford Life Insurance Company (Hartford), appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County which found Hartford liable to Appellees, Joseph Fisher (Fisher), Joseph Franco (Franco), Peter Zablocki (Zablocki), Irene Drusky (Drusky), and Francis Muracca (Muracca) and the Borough liable to Muracca only for benefits due from a failed employee pension plan. The trial court's decision is affirmed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases