RUNCI v. VERNAL


557 A.2d 202 (1989)

Michael RUNCI, pro ami v. Robert VERNAL, et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided May 2, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martha Harris, Paine, Lynch & Harris, Bangor, for plaintiff.

Neil S. Shankman, Legal Center of Maine, Lewiston, Eugene Coughlin, Bangor, for defendants.

Before ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD, HORNBY and COLLINS, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Robert and Lorraine Vernal appeal from an order of the Superior Court (Piscataquis County, MacInnes, A.R.J.) denying their motion to dissolve an ex parte order of attachment previously granted to Michael Runci by the court (Beaulieu, J.). Because the Vernals fail to demonstrate that Runci's claim is so insubstantial as to foreclose a reasonable chance of recovery, we affirm. Burns v. Smith, 495 A.2d 777

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases