1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 213 Cal.App.3d
  5. 213 Cal.App.3d 536 (1989)
 

PEOPLE v. SUPERIOR COURT (PERRY)

Docket No. E006577.

213 Cal.App.3d 536 (1989)

261 Cal. Rptr. 665

THE PEOPLE, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, Respondent; R. MICHAEL PERRY et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

August 24, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Grover C. Trask II, District Attorney, and Curtis R. Hinman, Deputy District Attorney, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Ephraim Margolin and Nicholas C. Arguimbau for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

HOLLENHORST, J.

In a letter to counsel for Perry, Hixon, and Greene, real parties in interest, the district attorney advised he had granted "limited use immunity" to the trio in expectation of their forthcoming testimony before the grand jury.1

Mr. Polis responded that his clients would assert their Fifth Amendment rights notwithstanding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases