1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 715 F.Supp.
  5. 715 F.Supp. 32 (1989)
 

AMODIO v. BLINDER, ROBINSON & CO.

Civ. No. H-89-233 (PCD).

715 F.Supp. 32 (1989)

John A. AMODIO, et al. v. BLINDER, ROBINSON & CO.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

June 23, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Weinstein, Pearson, Baum & Weinstein, West Hartford, Conn., for plaintiffs.

Eliot B. Gersten, Gersten & Clifford, Hartford, Conn., for defendant.

RULING ON MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

DORSEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs allege violations of Section 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77l; Section 10 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j; and the Connecticut Uniform Securities Act, Conn.Gen.Stat. §§ 36-470, 36-472 and 36-498. Plaintiffs also assert common law claims of negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation. Plaintiffs propose an action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases