1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 115 N.J.
  5. 115 N.J. 628 (1989)
 

RAHNEFELD v. SECURITY INS. CO. OF HARTFORD

115 N.J. 628 (1989)

560 A.2d 670

HELEN RAHNEFELD, PLAINTIFF, AND JEFFREY M. RAHNEFELD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, A CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 18, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles F. Harris argued the cause for appellant (Harris & Zielinski, attorneys).

H. Scott Hart argued the cause for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In Zupo v. CNA Insurance Co., 98 N.J. 30 (1984), we adopted the principle that when an automobile liability-insurance carrier has made payments of personal injury protection (PIP) benefits in connection with a compensable injury and is chargeable with knowledge at the time of its last payment that the injury will probably require additional treatment in the future, then the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases