Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the trial court erred when it omitted the statutory definitions of "deprive" and "appropriate" (Penal Law § 155.00 [3], [4]) from its supplemental instructions to the jury on the grand larceny charges has not been preserved for appellate review in that no objection was made thereto, nor was a request for a more amplified instruction made (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Burnice
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.