1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 48 Cal.3d
  5. 48 Cal.3d 690 (1989)
 

HITCHCOCK v. STATE BAR

Docket No. S003169.

48 Cal.3d 690 (1989)

771 P.2d 394

257 Cal. Rptr. 696

WILLIAM CONLEY HITCHCOCK, Petitioner, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

Supreme Court of California.

April 27, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

William Conley Hitchcock, in pro. per., and Jeffrey M. Howard for Petitioner.

Herbert M. Rosenthal, Diane C. Yu, Truitt A. Richey, Jr., Magdalene Y. O'Rourke and Dominique Snyder for Respondent.

OPINION

THE COURT.*

In this proceeding we consider a unanimous recommendation of the Review Department of the State Bar Court that petitioner, William Conley Hitchcock, be disbarred. Petitioner contends that (a) the review department violated his right to due process of the law by deleting seven findings of fact from the decision of the hearing panel, (b) the review department's recommendation is not supported...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases