U.S. v. DAVIS

No. 87 Cr. 853 (TPG).

718 F.Supp. 8 (1989)

UNITED STATES of America v. Brooks Gregory DAVIS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

August 25, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Richman, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, for plaintiff.

Ronald Rubinstein, Kew Gardens, N.Y., Charles Rominger, Dilley and Dilley, Grand Rapids, Mich., and Ruth M. Liebsman and Richard B. Lind, New York City, for defendants.


OPINION

GRIESA, District Judge.

Certain issues need to be decided prior to the imposition of the sentences in this case. There is a difference of view as to whether the Sentencing Guidelines apply to Count 1. The Government contends that they do apply, and all four defendants argue to the contrary. Also, Wayne Davis has asked for a ruling that he may make statements to the Probation Department and to the court in connection with his sentencing without having...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases