1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 716 F.Supp.
  5. 716 F.Supp. 7 (1989)
 

RHINEHART v. CINCINNATI INC.

Civ. A. No. 89-CV-71810-DT.

716 F.Supp. 7 (1989)

Hugh D. RHINEHART, a/k/a Hughie D. Rhinehart and Catherine Rhinehart, his wife, Plaintiffs, v. CINCINNATI INCORPORATED, and Reuland Electric Co., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D.

July 27, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl M. Riseman, Lapeer, Mich., for plaintiffs.

Dennis M. Goebel, Bloomfield Hills, Mich., Kenneth Resnick, Cincinnati, Ohio, and David G. Sekerak, Novi, Mich., for defendants.

OPINION

DUGGAN, District Judge.

On May 11, 1989, plaintiff filed this products liability action against the defendants in the Oakland County (Michigan) Circuit Court. On June 8, 1989, defendants removed the action to this Court, relying on 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), as recently amended, which, by virtue of the amendment, provides that federal district courts shall have jurisdiction in diversity cases only where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases