1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 434 N.W.2d
  5. 434 N.W.2d 288 (1989)
 

KARNES v. MILO BEAUTY & BARBER SUPPLY

No. C5-88-2537.

434 N.W.2d 288 (1989)

Nan Mary KARNES, Respondent, v. MILO BEAUTY AND BARBER SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., d/b/a The Milo Corporation, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 17, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary L. Huusko, St. Paul, for respondent.

Susan L. Segal, Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty, & Bennett, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Considered at Special Term and decided by WOZNIAK, C.J., and LANSING and CRIPPEN, JJ., without oral argument.

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

FACTS

On December 9, 1988, appellants filed a notice of appeal seeking review of a judgment allegedly entered on September 16, 1988. Appellants' statement of the case indicated the appeal was from an "Order for Entry of Judgment" dated September 16, 1988. Appellants did not file a certified copy of a September 16 judgment with the appeal as required by Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 103.01, subd. 1, but instead submitted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases