ADAMS v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INS. CO.

Docket No. 106301.

177 Mich. App. 543 (1989)

442 N.W.2d 641

ADAMS v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided January 25, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan E. Holt, for plaintiffs.

Gault, Davison, Bowers & Hill (by Edward B. Davison), for defendants.

Before: MacKENZIE, P.J., and WEAVER and E.A. QUINNELL, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Defendants appeal as of right from the trial court's denial of summary disposition in favor of the defendant insurers. We reverse.

The clear and unambiguous exclusionary language concerning recovery of uninsured motorist benefits under plaintiffs' two insurance policies is almost identical to the language of the exclusionary clause contained in Michigan Mutual Liability Co v Karsten, 13 Mich.App. 46

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases