S.E.C. v. PACIFIC BELL

Misc. No. 88-0234.

704 F.Supp. 11 (1989)

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Applicant, v. PACIFIC BELL, Respondent.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

January 11, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John H. Sturc, Jerry A. Isenberg, Rudolph Gerlich, Jr., Wayne A. Wirtz, S.E.C., Washington, D.C., for applicant.

Martin J. Jenkins, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

SPORKIN, District Judge.

On July 22, 1988, applicant Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") filed in this court an application requesting this court to direct respondent Pacific Bell to show cause why it should not be ordered to produce the telephone records requested in two subpoenas issued by the Commission on March 10 and 11, 1988, and further requesting that the court order Pacific Bell to obey the subpoenas.

On...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases