PER CURIAM.
The trial court correctly determined the merits of this case by summary judgment for the defendant. There is no basis, however, for deducting from the amounts admittedly due the plaintiff his alleged "pro rata share of the expenses" involved either in collecting the funds in question or in attorney's fees. The provision for a set-off for these amounts as provided in paragraph 1(i) is stricken from the final judgment which is otherwise...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
