BOHLE v. THOMPSON

No. 915, September Term, 1988.

78 Md. App. 614 (1989)

554 A.2d 818

JAMES K. BOHLE ET UX. v. HAROLD RODNEY THOMPSON ET AL.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

March 13, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven T. Cain, Upper Marlboro, for appellants.

Debra B. Koehler (Naji P. Maloof, on the brief), Upper Marlboro, for appellees.

Argued before MOYLAN, ALPERT and ROBERT M. BELL, JJ.


ALPERT, Judge.

Oft times members of both the bench and bar are criticized for failing to distinguish the forest from the trees. In this case, however, the controversy arises from an attempt to separate the trees from the forest. On appeal, a veritable smorgasbord of issues are presented, including questions on parol evidence, conversion, effect of notice of prior interest in property, and attorney's fees. The appeal stems from a controversy concerning the ownership...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases