Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the suppression court erred in failing to suppress both his oral and written statements to the police since they had knowledge of unrelated pending charges against him. We disagree. The record indicates that the defendant repeatedly told the police that his prior criminal cases had been resolved and the police were thereafter justified in relying upon his representations (see, People v Lucarano...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.