PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CAS. v. MYERS


232 N.J. Super. 455 (1989)

557 A.2d 686

PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THEODORE W. MYERS AND BRENDAN MYERS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 24, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schaff, Motiuk, Gladstone, Moeller and Reed, attorneys for appellants (Donald F. Scholl and Robert B. Reed, of counsel; Donald F. Scholl, on the brief and reply brief).

Robert A. Auerbach, attorney for respondent (Randi S. Greenberg, on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, LONG and MUIR, Jr.


The opinion of the court was delivered by MUIR, Jr., J.A.D.

This appeal focuses on the enforceability of an automobile insurance policy provision restricting uninsured motorist (UM) coverage to personal injury losses sustained in the United States, its territories or possessions, or Canada. Plaintiff issued a policy with that restriction to defendant Theodore Myers. The policy named defendant Brendan Myers as an additional insured. Brendan Myers sustained bodily injury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases