1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 207 Cal.App.3d
  5. 207 Cal.App.3d 479 (1989)
 

KARDLY v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

Docket No. B026616.

207 Cal.App.3d 479 (1989)

255 Cal. Rptr. 40

RAYMOND KARDLY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

January 25, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Clarence A. Wildes, Allan F. Grossman, Dennis A. Fischer and Alan S. Yockelson for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Archbald & Spray, Kenneth L. Moes, Douglas B. Large and James P. Gazdecki, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

GILBERT, J.

Plaintiffs, Raymond and Esther Kardly, were involved in an automobile accident. State Farm, their insurance company, refused to pay certain claims which caused them to suffer emotional distress. Meanwhile, they won a judgment in a personal injury action against the driver of the other vehicle, and recovered damages for emotional distress. We hold that the judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases