FIDEL, Judge.
A computer programmer declined to follow his employer's directive to decode a program he had prepared in an encoded state. He was convicted of criminal damage. We reverse.
We find that defendant did not criminally damage his employer's program by encoding it because he did so with his employer's permission. We hold that one does not criminally damage the property of another under Arizona law when one acts with the
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.