1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 562 A.2d
  5. 562 A.2d 116 (1989)
 

DONAHUE v. D.C. BD. OF PSYCHOLOGY

No. 88-132.

562 A.2d 116 (1989)

Joan M. DONAHUE, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGY, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided July 18, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randell C. Ogg, with whom Michael F. Curtin, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner.

Donna M. Murasky, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Frederick D. Cooke, Jr., Corp. Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondent.

Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, and MACK and STEADMAN, Associate Judges.

ROGERS, Chief Judge:

Petitioner Joan M. Donahue began and completed her doctoral degree in guidance and counseling at a time when the District of Columbia Code provided that a person with either a doctoral degree in a field "related to psychology" or a "doctoral degree in psychology" could become licensed to practice psychology" in the District of Columbia. D.C.Code § 2-1704.6(2)(A) & (B) (1981). While fulfilling her two-year experience requirement the Council...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases