UREMOVICH v. STATE ETHICS COM'N


129 Pa.Commw. 549 (1989)

566 A.2d 375

George F. UREMOVICH, Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, STATE ETHICS COMMISSION, Respondent. Larry SPAHR, Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, STATE ETHICS COMMISSION, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided November 21, 1989.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied June 22, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas A. Lonich, with him, Robert L. Ceisler, Ceisler, Richman & Smith, Washington, for petitioners.

Vincent J. Dopko, Chief Counsel, Harrisburg, for respondent.

Before CRAIG, BARRY and SMITH, JJ.


CRAIG, Judge.

George F. Uremovich and Larry Spahr file appeals, now consolidated, from respective State Ethics Commission decisions that each man used his position as an elected supervisor of Union Township, a second class township, to obtain financial gain in violation of section 3(a) of the State Ethics Act.1

Specifically, the commission found, after a hearing, that, although both supervisors also serve as township roadmasters...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases