1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 113 N.J.
  5. 113 N.J. 565 (1989)
 

BROWN v. CITY OF NEWARK

113 N.J. 565 (1989)

552 A.2d 125

RICHARD BROWN AND ERNEST KING, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 18, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathleen C. Goger argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Glenn A. Grant, Corporation Counsel, attorney).

Louis Raveson argued the cause for respondents and cross-appellants (Louis Raveson, attorney; Edward McCardell, on the brief).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, J.

This appeal requires us to determine the validity of an ordinance regulating peddlers in the City of Newark. The Law Division invalidated all or part of ten of the nineteen sections of the ordinance, and the Appellate Division reinstated seven of those sections. 202 N.J.Super. 1 (1987). We granted Newark's petition and the peddlers' cross-petition for certification,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases