WATERMAN v. RABINOVITZ

No. 2 CA-CV 88-0227.

161 Ariz. 511 (1989)

779 P.2d 826

Joseph WATERMAN, individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Muriel Y. Waterman, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Bernard I. RABINOVITZ and Jane Doe Rabinovitz, husband and wife; Rabinovitz, Dix & Sands, P.C., Defendants/Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

As Corrected April 24, 1989.

Review Denied October 11, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur L. Hirsch, Tucson, for defendants/appellants.

Law Offices of Garven W. Videen by Garven W. Videen, Tucson, for plaintiff/appellee.


OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Judge.

The two issues involved in this appeal are whether there was a joint venture agreement between the parties and whether appellee's claim for breach of the agreement is barred by the statute of limitations.

The trial court's findings of fact are essentially as follows: Both parties are attorneys licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona. Appellee Joseph Waterman entered into a contract in December 1975 with the David...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases