1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 443 N.W.2d
  5. 443 N.W.2d 228 (1989)
 

ANDRASKO v. ANDRASKO

No. C9-89-154.

443 N.W.2d 228 (1989)

In the Matter of Eva Marie ANDRASKO, Petitioner, Respondent, v. Joseph Bernard ANDRASKO, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 1, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eva Marie Andrasko, Grand Rapids, pro se.

Thomas J. Bieter, Duluth, for Joseph Bernard Andrasko.

Heard, considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and NORTON and MULALLY, JJ.

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Joseph Andrasko appeals from a domestic abuse protection order. Andrasko claims that there was not sufficient evidence to warrant the order, that the trial court abused its discretion by denying a continuance, and that the court failed to make required findings regarding domestic abuse. We reverse.

FACTS

On December 16, 1988, Eva Andrasko petitioned for an order of protection from domestic abuse. Eva alleged that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases