FRANKEL v. FRANKEL


150 A.D.2d 520 (1989)

Harriet Frankel, Respondent, v. Alex Frankel, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 15, 1989


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in awarding the plaintiff wife $600 per week maintenance, pendente lite, $3,500 in interim counsel fees and $5,000 for expert fees. The Supreme Court duly considered the plaintiff's needs as well as the defendant's financial ability to provide for those needs (see, Chachkes v Chachkes,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases