DANAHY, Judge.
The appellant challenges (1) the denial of his motion to suppress evidence against him and (2) his sentences for both trafficking in cocaine and possession of cocaine based upon the same amount of cocaine found in the appellant's possession. We find no error in the denial of the appellant's motion to suppress and affirm as to that issue.
However, we agree with the appellant that it was improper to sentence him for both trafficking in cocaine...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
