BISCOE v. BISCOE

No. C2-88-2513.

443 N.W.2d 221 (1989)

In re the Marriage of Scott A. BISCOE, Petitioner, Respondent, v. Melanie R. BISCOE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 1, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Solien, Haberkorn & Solien, Ltd., Aitkin, for respondent.

Judith L. Oakes, J. Oakes & Associates, St. Paul, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and NORTON and MULALLY, JJ.


OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant Melanie Biscoe appeals from a 1988 judgment amendment, claiming (1) the trial court did not have jurisdiction to modify the visitation provisions of the original decree and must make findings supporting its jurisdiction, (2) the trial court erred in receiving a visitation home study report as evidence without allowing cross-examination of the investigator, (3) the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases