1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 112 Wn.2d
  5. 112 Wn.2d 552 (1989)
 

VAN PATTEN v. JENSEN

No. 54502-2.

112 Wn.2d 552 (1989)

773 P.2d 62

LEE T. VAN PATTEN, Respondent, v. CARL JENSEN, ET AL, Petitioners.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

May 18, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hendricks & Lewis, by Katherine Hendricks, O. Yale Lewis, Jr., and Christine E. Dinsdale; Bogle & Gates, by Guy P. Michelson and Michael P. Mirande; Davis, Wright & Jones, by Bruce Lamka; and Helsell, Fetterman, Martin, Todd & Hokanson, by William A. Helsell and Linda M. Roubik, for petitioners Jensen, et al.

George, Hull & Porter, P.S., by T. Dennis George, Howard I. Hall, and Jeffrey B. Mahan, for petitioners King.

Casey & Pruzan, by Michael A. Larson, for respondent.

UTTER, J.

Lee Van Patten deposited funds with Westside Federal Savings and Loan (Westside) before the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (the Board) declared Westside insolvent. After the insolvency, he filed a complaint under article 12, section 12 of the Washington Constitution (section 12), seeking to recover the amount of his alleged deposit exceeding the federally insured amount of $100,000, plus accrued interest, costs and attorney fees. Petitioners, defendants below...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases