AMATULLI v. DELHI CONSTR. CORP.


156 A.D.2d 500 (1989)

Vincent Amatulli, Jr., an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Lorraine Amatulli, et al., Respondent-Appellant, v. Delhi Construction Corporation, Respondent; Brothers Three, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, and Seaspray Sharkline, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Patrick Daly, Doing Business as Woodsman Construction Company, et al., Third- and Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents; Philip Susi et al., Defendants and Fourth-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 13, 1989


Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, with one bill of costs to the defendant Seaspray Sharkline, Inc., payable by the defendant third-party plaintiff-appellant-respondent, the defendants fourth-party plaintiffs-appellants-respondents and the plaintiff-respondent-appellant, appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

We conclude that the Supreme Court properly granted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases