1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 215 Cal.App.3d
  5. 215 Cal.App.3d 438 (1989)
 

HOCK INVESTMENT v. CITY & CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO

Docket No. A042059.

215 Cal.App.3d 438 (1989)

263 Cal. Rptr. 665

HOCK INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

September 22, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Peter G. Hanson, James M. Wagstaffe, Kaus & Kerr and Kaus, Kerr & Wagstaffe for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Louise H. Renne, City Attorney, and Andrew W. Schwartz, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

KLINE, P.J. —

INTRODUCTION

Hock Investment Company, Inc. (Hock) appeals a judgment of dismissal following the trial court's sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend its complaint against the City and County of San Francisco (City) and various City officials. The complaint, which sought declaratory relief and was accompanied by a petition for writ of mandate, challenged a 1982 condominium conversion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases