ANDERSON v. LLOYD'S FEED SERVICE

No. C3-88-2231.

443 N.W.2d 208 (1989)

Bruce E. ANDERSON, et al., Appellants, v. LLOYD'S FEED SERVICE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 1, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Charles Krikava, Samuel L. Hanson, Briggs and Morgan, Minneapolis, for Bruce E. Anderson.

Kevin O'Connor Green, Mankato, for Jane Anderson.

John M. Sheran, Farrish, Johnson & Maschke, Mankato, for Lloyd's Feed Service.

Heard, considered, and decided by WOZNIAK, C.J., and CRIPPEN and SHORT, JJ.


OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

Appellants Bruce and Jane Anderson brought an action against respondent Lloyd's Feed Service for breach of an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. The jury found Lloyd's Feed had breached its implied warranty and the Andersons had suffered damages. The trial court initially adopted these findings, but later granted Lloyd's Feed's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV). The Andersons argue that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases