DAMICO v. ROYAL INS. CO.


383 Pa.Super. 239 (1989)

556 A.2d 886

Paul DAMICO, Appellant, v. ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Filed March 31, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven C. Forman, Philadelphia, for appellant.

March C. Brennan, New Jersey, for appellee.

Before OLSZEWSKI, BECK and JOHNSON, JJ.


BECK, Judge:

The issues before this court involve whether a dismissal without prejudice for failure to join an indispensable party is an appealable order and whether that party was in fact indispensable. We conclude that the trial court's decision that it lacked jurisdiction because of the failure to join an indispensable party was an appealable order and that the trial judge correctly concluded that the party not joined was indispensable. Therefore, we affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases