1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 449 N.W.2d
  5. 449 N.W.2d 168 (1989)
 

BLOHM v. MINNEAPOLIS UROLOGICAL SURGEONS

No. C6-88-2515.

449 N.W.2d 168 (1989)

Roger D. BLOHM, et al., Respondents, v. MINNEAPOLIS UROLOGICAL SURGEONS, P.A., et al., Respondents, Metropolitan Internists, P.A., et al., Petitioners.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

December 22, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert M. Frazee, Robert E. Salmon, Minneapolis, for petitioners.

Reed K. MacKenzie, MacKenzie & Hallberg, Minneapolis, for Roger D. Blohm, et al.

Donna J. Blazevic, Bassford, Heckt, Lockhart, Truesdell & Briggs, P.A., Minneapolis, for Minneapolis Urological Surgeons, et al.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.

SIMONETT, Justice.

This case raises questions about the application of Minn.Stat. § 595.02, subd. 5 (1988), which provides, in medical malpractice actions, for defense counsel to have an "informal discussion" with physicians who have treated plaintiff.

Plaintiff Roger Blohm has sued doctors Kieley and Price,1 alleging negligent treatment (following cancer surgery) resulting in circulation problems in the lower extremities...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases