STATE v. DECAMERA


237 N.J. Super. 380 (1989)

568 A.2d 86

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH DECAMERA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 18, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Puff & Aimino, attorneys for appellant (Michael A. Aimino, on the brief).

Stephen G. Raymond, Burlington County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Deborah A. Siegrist, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, LONG and GRUCCIO.


The opinion of the court was delivered by GRUCCIO, J.A.D.

This case involves the constitutionality of a roadblock set up to apprehend drunk drivers. Defendant argues that State v. Kirk, 202 N.J.Super. 28 (App.Div. 1985), requires advance publicity of sobriety checkpoints. The Law Division judge, rejecting that contention, denied defendant's motion to suppress the evidence against him on the charge of drunken driving...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases