1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 115 N.J.
  5. 115 N.J. 491 (1989)
 

D'AGOSTINO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.

115 N.J. 491 (1989)

559 A.2d 420

RICHARD J. D'AGOSTINO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC., ROBERT N. WILSON, AND RONALD G. GELBMAN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 28, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas S. Eakeley argued the cause for appellants (Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, attorneys; Nicholas DeB. Katzenbach and Laura J. Berkowitz, on the briefs).

Douglas V. Rigler, a member of the District of Columbia bar, argued the cause for respondent (Lasser, Hochman, Marcus, Guryan and Kuskin, attorneys; Barry Eisenberg, on the briefs).

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Baime's thoughtful and comprehensive opinion below. 225 N.J.Super. 250 (1988).

We concur with the Appellate Division's summary of the general principles that guide application of the doctrine of forum non conveniens:

As we have pointed out, the present...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases