GRIMES v. MAYFIELD

No. CA-2614.

56 Ohio App. 3d 4 (1989)

GRIMES, APPELLANT, v. MAYFIELD, ADMR.; MANSFIELD PRODUCTS COMPANY, APPELLEE.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Richland County.

Decided January 19, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel K. Boda, for appellant.

Baran, Piper, Tarkowsky & Fitzgerald and John Tarkowsky, for appellee Mansfield Products Co.


WISE, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Richland County Court of Common Pleas overruling the motion for a new trial of plaintiff-appellant Michael Grimes ("employee").

Employee argues the following assignment of error:

"The trial court erred in its finding that the plaintiff was not entitled to a new trial based upon the weight of the evidence presented at trial."

Employee was employed by defendant-appellee, Mansfield Products Co...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases