STATE v. HOWARD

No. 87-2154.

42 Ohio St. 3d 18 (1989)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. HOWARD, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 12, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary L. VanBrocklin, prosecuting attorney, Mary Jane Stephens and Kathi McNabb, for appellant.

Randall M. Dana, public defender, and Robert L. Lane, for appellee.


DOUGLAS, J.

The sole issue before this court is whether the supplemental jury instruction given to the jury on July 31, 1981 was coercive in the sense that it pressured members of the jury who were in the minority to abandon their positions. The essential question becomes whether the supplemental instruction given to the jury by the trial judge, known as the Allen charge, is allowed in Ohio.

The Allen...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases