1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 156 A.D.2d
  5. 156 A.D.2d 438 (1989)
 

PIZZI v. CITY OF NEW YORK

156 A.D.2d 438 (1989)

Peter Pizzi, Individually and as Administrator of The Estate of Mary A. Miller, Also Known as Mary A. Bilella, Deceased, Respondent, v. City of New York et al., Defendants, and Welsbach Electric Corp. et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 11, 1989

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

As a general rule, the decision as to whether to install a traffic control device is a discretionary governmental function which will not expose a municipality to liability (see, Cimino v City of New York, 54 A.D.2d 843, affd 43 N.Y.2d 966; see also, Weiss v Fote, 7 N.Y.2d 579

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases