1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 539 N.E.2d
  5. 539 N.E.2d 45 (1989)
 

FROST v. PHENIX

No. 11A01-8810-CV-346.

539 N.E.2d 45 (1989)

William FROST and Marcia Frost, Appellants (Defendants below), v. Susan PHENIX and Bruce D. Phenix, Appellees (Plaintiffs below).

Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District.

June 6, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter G. Tamulonis, John N. Thompson, Jennifer Staton Stoesz, Kightlinger & Gray, Indianapolis, for appellants.

William G. Brown, Brown & Somheil, Brazil, for appellees.

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Appellant-defendants William and Marcia Frost (Frosts) bring this appeal after the trial court granted appellee-plaintiffs Bruce and Susan Phenixes' (Phenixes) motion to correct error following summary judgment in the Frosts' favor.

We affirm.

The evidence favorable to the Phenixes (non-movants on the summary judgment motion) shows that Susan was injured when she fell through a portion of the wood porch floor she was walking on as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases