ORGLER v. ORGLER


237 N.J. Super. 342 (1989)

568 A.2d 67

LISBETH HAINES ORGLER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. HARRY C. ORGLER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 29, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irene Rosenberg argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent (Skoloff & Wolfe, attorneys, Irene Rosenberg of counsel and on the briefs with Francis W. Donahue).

Richard Altman argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant (Pellettieri, Rabstein & Altman, attorneys, Neal S. Solomon and Deborah A. Rose on the brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA, O'BRIEN and HAVEY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by HAVEY, J.A.D.

In this matrimonial litigation defendant, Harry Orgler, appeals from an order which declared invalid an ante-nuptial agreement between defendant and his ex-wife, plaintiff Lisbeth Haines Orgler. Defendant also appeals from the equitable distribution provisions of the divorce judgment as modified by a post-judgment order. Specifically, he challenges the trial court's determination that the pre-marriage value of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases