TRINOVA CORP. v. TREASURY DEP'T.

Docket No. 82673, (Calendar No. 10).

433 Mich. 141 (1989)

445 N.W.2d 428

TRINOVA CORPORATION v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided August 21, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dickinson, Wright, Moon, Van Dusen & Freeman (by Ernest Getz and Peter S. Sheldon); Schwendener & Valade, P.C. (by Benjamin O. Schwendener, Jr.), of counsel, for the plaintiff.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Louis J. Caruso, Solicitor General, and Richard R. Roesch, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Amici Curiae:

Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone (by Samuel J. McKim III, P.C., Julianna B. Miller, and Robert F. Rhoades) for Amoco Chemicals Corporation, Amoco Oil Corporation, Amoco Production Corporation, AT & T Company, AT & T Information Systems, Inc, AT & T Technologies, AT & T Teletype Corporation, Avon Products, Inc, The Gillette Company, Lorillard, Inc, Shell Oil Company, Union Oil Company of California, Vulcan Materials Company, and Weather Shield, Inc.

Honigman, Miller, Schwartz & Cohn (by James H. Novis and William G. Christopher) for Champion International Corporation.

Foster, Swift, Collins & Coey, P.C. (by Lawrence B. Lindemer and Patrick R. Van Tiflin), for Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc., et al.

McDermott, Will & Emery (by Don S. Harnack, John S. Pennell, Richard A. Hanson, and Gregory G. Palmer) for Caterpillar Inc.

Clark, Klein & Beaumont (by Dwight H. Vincent, J. Walker Henry, Thomas S. Nowinski, Curtis J. Mann, and Joseph A. Bonventre) for Michigan Manufacturers Association.

William H. Crabtree; General Motors Corporation (by E. Alan Moorhouse), of counsel; and Ford Motor Company (by John M. Neberle), of counsel, for Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of the United States, Inc.


BOYLE, J.

In this case we are called upon to determine the proper standard for the granting of tax base apportionment relief under § 691 of the Single Business Tax Act, MCL 208.1 et seq.; MSA 7.558(1) et seq., when a taxpayer claims that the apportionment provisions of the act fail to fairly represent the extent of the taxpayer's business activity within this state. The Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases