1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 112 Wn.2d
  5. 112 Wn.2d 456 (1989)
 

HITE v. PUD 2

No. 55420-0.

112 Wn.2d 456 (1989)

772 P.2d 481

DONALD HITE, ET AL, Respondents, v. PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2, Petitioner.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

May 4, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ray A. Foianini, for petitioner.

Garth L. Dano and Jill Irene Lunn, for respondents.

Elizabeth Thomas and Thomas Eli Backer, amici curiae for petitioner.

ANDERSEN, J.

FACTS OF CASE

At issue in this case is whether a public utility district may contract with its customers for a lien to secure the payment of electricity charges. We hold that it can, and reverse the trial court and the Court of Appeals.1

On June 6, 1975, Donald and Mary Hite, plaintiffs herein, entered into an "Irrigation Power Agreement and Right-of-Way Easement" with Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases