LAST v. LAST

No. C5-88-2084.

438 N.W.2d 122 (1989)

In re the Marriage of Merriam C. LAST, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Douglas A. LAST, Respondent. Edward L. WINER, et al., judgment creditors, Respondents, v. Merriam C. LAST, judgment debtor, Appellant, and Douglas A. Last, garnishee, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 4, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Constantine J. Gekas, Jack Jaycox Law Firm, Bloomington, for Merriam C. Last.

James B. Storkamp, Hastings, for Douglas A. Last.

Christopher Farwell, Mark P. Kovalchuk, Moss & Barnett, Minneapolis, for Edward L. Winer, et al.

Considered and decided by SHORT, P.J., and NIERENGARTEN and NORTON, JJ., without oral argument.


OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

Appellant argues that the trial court erred as a matter of law in determining that respondent creditors could garnish appellant's spousal maintenance in order to collect a judgment for attorney fees. Appellant further contends that maintenance payments are not earnings within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 571.55 (1988). We disagree and affirm the trial court's decision.

FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases