Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We find that the hearing court properly determined that the People had established, by clear and convincing evidence, that the proposed in-court identification of the defendant by an undercover police investigator was based upon the officer's observations made on the three occasions when he purchased drugs from the defendant (see, Neil v Biggers,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.