BRATTON v. MENARD, INC.

No. C8-88-2046.

438 N.W.2d 116 (1989)

Donald BRATTON, Appellant, v. MENARD, INC., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied June 9, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Warchol, Warchol, Berndt & Hajek, Michael H. Hennen, Rerat Law Firm, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Kevin E. Giebel, Corporate Counsel, Menard, Inc., Eau Claire, Wis., for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by PARKER, P.J., and SCHUMACHER and SCHULTZ, JJ.


SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellant was discharged by respondent a short time before his right to a bonus accrued. The trial court ruled that appellant was an at-will employee, his dismissal could be for any reason, and granted summary judgment. We reverse, since genuine issues of material fact exist which preclude summary judgment.

FACTS

Appellant Bratton worked for respondent Menard, Inc. from January 17, 1973 until December 2, 1982, when he was terminated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases