1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 448 N.W.2d
  5. 448 N.W.2d 103 (1989)
 

AMERICAN DRUGGISTS' INS. CO. v. SHOPPE

No. C2-89-1078.

448 N.W.2d 103 (1989)

AMERICAN DRUGGISTS' INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. George L. SHOPPE, Jr., et al., Appellants, MLE Plumbing & Heating, Inc., Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 28, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark R. Miller, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Roger A. Nurnberger, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Heard, considered, and decided by GARDEBRING, P.J., and FORSBERG and RANDALL, JJ.

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellants George and Elaine Shoppe challenge the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent American Druggists' Insurance Company. Appellants argue the trial court erred because (1) there was no consideration for the parties' indemnity agreement, and (2) respondent's claim is barred by the Statute of Frauds, Minn.Stat. § 513.01 (1980). We affirm.

FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases