1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 212 Conn.
  5. 212 Conn. 338 (1989)
 

HALLAS v. WINDSOR

(13567)

212 Conn. 338 (1989)

HERBERT C. HALLAS ET AL. v. TOWN OF WINDSOR ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released August 1, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary Katz Moule, with whom were Herbert C. Hallas and, on the brief, Christopher C. Noble, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Francis H. Morrison III, with whom were Judith A. Blank and, on the brief, Susan J. Barnes, for the appellees (named defendant et al.).

Ralph G. Elliot, for the appellee (defendant Albert G. Ilg).

Thomas F. Parker, for the appellee (defendant Ruth Levine).

PETERS, C. J., CALLAHAN, GLASS, HULL and SANTANIELLO, JS.

HULL, J.

This appeal arises from an action brought by the plaintiffs, Herbert Hallas and Mary Katz Moule, against the defendants, the town of Windsor, Windsor town manager Albert G. Ilg, Windsor director of finance Antoinette J. Anderson, and former Windsor director of finance Ruth Levine,1 alleging that appropriations made by the Windsor town council to fund two road construction projects in the town were in violation of the town charter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases