JACKSON v. ROGERS & WELLS

Docket No. D007361.

210 Cal.App.3d 336 (1989)

258 Cal. Rptr. 454

FRANCIS JACKSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ROGERS & WELLS et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

May 10, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Aguirre & Meyer, Michael J. Aguirre, Patricia A. Meyer, Harrigan, Ruff, Ryder & Sbardellati and Joseph Ruff for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Gray, Cary, Ames & Frye, Marcelle E. Mihaila, William E. Grauer and Richard W. McAlister for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

HUFFMAN, J.

Francis Jackson appeals an order for dismissal entered after demurrers to his second amended complaint were sustained without leave to amend and his claim for punitive damages was stricken. He contends the public policies prohibiting assignment of legal malpractice causes of action and punitive damages claims should not bar this action, based on his characterization of his assigned claims as sounding in fraud and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases