1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 112 Wn.2d
  5. 112 Wn.2d 433 (1989)
 

CITY OF EVERETT v. SNOHOMISH COUNTY

No. 54682-7.

112 Wn.2d 433 (1989)

772 P.2d 992

THE CITY OF EVERETT, Respondent, v. SNOHOMISH COUNTY, ET AL, Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

May 4, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Seth R. Dawson, Prosecuting Attorney, and Sue A. Tanner, Deputy, for appellants.

Bruce E. Jones, City Attorney, and Sullivan, Graafstra & Twisselman, by James D. Twisselman, for respondent.

ANDERSEN, J.

FACTS OF CASE

This "sibling rivalry" case involves a zoning dispute between a county and city. Snohomish County claims its zoning authority is paramount and the City of Everett claims it is not. It is the City's argument that the statutes empowering the City to dispose of its sewage sludge and solid waste, together with the City's general eminent domain power, establish its authority to locate a disposal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases