KAMPSEN v. COUNTY OF KANDIYOHI

No. C6-88-330.

441 N.W.2d 103 (1989)

Randy KAMPSEN, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF KANDIYOHI, Respondent, Steven Strom, et al., etc., Petitioners, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

May 26, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George E. Hulstrand, Hulstrand, Anderson & Larson, Willmar, for appellants.

Robert D. Stoneburner, Paynesville, for Randy Kampsen.

Robert M. Frisbee, Frisbee & Holahan, Ltd., Edina, for Kandiyohi County.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.


KELLEY, Justice.

The issue posed by this case is whether one who possesses personal property owned by another, converts the latter's property by retaining it and ultimately selling it to satisfy a claimed lien without first taking steps reasonably designed to provide notification to the owner of the intent to foreclose the claimed lien. By granting the possessor summary judgment, the trial court, in effect, held that the possessor as a matter of law had provided adequate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases