1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 155 A.D.2d
  5. 155 A.D.2d 387 (1989)
 

WEL v. PALAZZO

155 A.D.2d 387 (1989)

Madelyn Vander Wel et al., Appellants, v. Philip J. Palazzo, Respondent, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 30, 1989

Supreme Court erred in excluding the X rays taken by plaintiff-appellant's medical witness in September 1987, which were relevant and admissible as demonstrative evidence of the condition resulting from respondent's alleged malpractice. X rays have long been held admissible when explained by a competent expert witness (see, Marion v Coon Constr. Co., 216 N.Y. 178, 181 [1915]). The X rays proffered by appellant satisfied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases